: j0193324.wmf
 : , ,  ...
  : 19 KB  : j0193324.wmf
 : , ,  ...
  : 19 KB  : j0193324.wmf
 : , ,  ...
  : 19 KBText Box: Increased number of drifting Icebergs from accelerated melting of the polar caps.

Text Box: Expanding deserts

Text Box: Stronger winds, storms, and hurricanes.

Text Box: Sand storms

  : j0090234.wmf
 : , ,  ...
  : 11 KBText Box: Raising ocean level

  : j0090028.wmf
 : polar ice breakers, ,  ...
  : 8 KB  : j0200381.wmf
 : ,   ,  ...
  : 39 KB  : j0200381.wmf
 : ,   ,  ...
  : 39 KB  : j0200381.wmf
 : ,   ,  ...
  : 39 KBText Box: Raining replenishes underground waters.

  : j0193324.wmf
 : , ,  ...
  : 19 KBText Box: Evaporation

  : j0193324.wmf
 : , ,  ...
  : 19 KB  : j0193324.wmf
 : , ,  ...
  : 19 KBText Box: Decreasing inhabitable territories, and increasing population, respectively  growing needs for resources:  water and food supplies, energy, etc.

Text Box: Cooled ocean water and altered salinity are disrupting the currents.

Text Box: Endangered shipping and oil industry

Text Box: DIP

Text Box:  

  : j0200381.wmf
 : ,   ,  ...
  : 39 KB  : j0200381.wmf
 : ,   ,  ...
  : 39 KB 

 

[Home]

 

[About]

 

[View]

 

[Links]

[Contact]

 

 

 

 

 

Text Box: Harnesing the power of lightning - utilizing the electricity  - electrolysis for large H2 production.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DIP is about cut part of the broken icebergs drifting near polar circles and paste them into chosen places in the desert areas, where the water is used for intensive greening. The prerequisites are:

 

 

 

The icebergs

 

As a result of global warming there are more calving icebergs drifting freely in the ocean. These icebergs decrease the white area that reflects the sunlight back, thus allowing the sun to heat the Earth more than average (in certain period of time), which leads to chain reaction more melted and broken icebergs, more heat, etc. Second damage is the fact that when the icebergs break off from the glacier they contribute to ocean level raising. This tendency threatens a lot of countries, such as Bangladesh, Netherlands, Japan, England and many other low, coastal lands, meaning possibility of massive immigration wave. Third damage is that melted icebergs change the saltiness of the ocean water thus disrupting oceans natural streams a complicated process ruled by the saltiness and temperatures in different layers. Eventual distortion of the currents could baffle the spread of the warmth and to bring global freezing, which could be fatal for many species as well as people.

Oceans surface is a natural habitat for many microorganisms (part of the food chain), that live through photosynthesis / absorbing CO2. A drastic change in their environment (temperature, saltiness, acidity, etc.) could disrupt their behavior, thus worsening the entire circle.

There are more than 720 oil platforms in Atlantic Ocean, only. Not to mention the increasing shipping traffic all over the world. Collision with an iceberg still remains a threat. To prevent this today Coastal Guards use radar and visual surveillance, satellite photos, radio buoys, etc.

Recent news from southern hemisphere in Dec.2006 few broken icebergs were observed very near to the New Zealand coastline. The nature is actually "helping" us, by cutting the transport expenses - the main drawback in DIP. Instead of watching them as a tourist attraction, we could use these vast amounts of fresh water, especially when they are so close to a place in need. Given that Australia suffers severe drought, water shortage and forest fires, this is really a "hint" by the nature how we can deliver fresh water comparatively cheap to a place where the water is very scarce, and use it not just for consumption, but also for starting massive greening operation. More

 

 

top

 

 

The deserts

 

There are deserts on every continent. They cover more than a third of the land on Earth. In Australia alone they cover around 70%. Deserts are expanding all the time, even right now; while youre reading this, they take new territories. Sandstorms as well as the advancing sand dunes destroy life they kill the plants, respectively the cattle, respectively the farming, and so on thus making human presence there very hard to survival = immigration wave.

Satellite scanning and historical traces show that many years ago Sahara was fruitful, green savanna. So, today we can reverse desertification in some parts of the deserts in order to secure better environment for our needs. More

 

top

 

 

 

The atmosphere

 

The third climate formation element the air is nonetheless affected by the climate change. The gathered data confirms the accelerated growth rates of the greenhouse gases quantities. Lesser number of trees, respectively leaf leads to less absorbed CO2, respectively thicker blanket and higher rate of global warming (partially offseted by the opposite process aerosol induced Global Dimming). Higher average temperatures mean higher vaporization rates, meaning more water vapour in the atmosphere, this way adding to the greenhouse effect.

Temperature extremes take many casualties, often overload the power grids and devastate the agriculture. Except overloads and blackouts these temperature extremes bring also an energy hunger - for cooling in summer and heating in winter, thus demanding more energy production in todays methods this equals to even more released CO2. More

 

 

top

 

 

The energy-CO2 connection

 

More than 2 billion people have no access to energy. On the other hand global energy demands are expected to grow by 60% over the next 25 years. Provided that we will continue to use mainly the traditional methods and technologies for energy production, even shaped by the latest international agreements regarding the emission demands, this will cause a significant increase in greenhouse gas emissions. More

 

top

 

 

The human factor

 

The advancing sands and raising water levels limit the size of the appropriate habitable zones. On the other hand urbanization expands because of the growing population and immigration (better work perspectives=better life possibilities). Increased density brings problems like diseases, social, ethnic and religious conflicts, etc. Another factor is the enormous number of unemployment people they have very limited means of livelihood, respectively incomes. Misery leads to illiteracy and embitterment, which is the foundation for religious fanaticism and violence.

There is growing paradox - more people are unnecessary as workers and more are necessary as consumers. But how to consume when you don't have a job, which would give you the income, which would allow you to consume? More

 

top

 

  

The objectives / benefits

 

By turning the negatives into advantages Desert Ice Project suggests complex solution of multiple vital problems. Whether the water for the greening will be delivered by iceberg movement or by massive appliance of powerful desalinisation stations distributed widely on the coastal lines (let the best method win), it should improve the situation for all the abovementioned sides:

Stabilized global average temperatures should decrease the process of polar ice melting/calving and the number of icebergs that overfill the oceans; restoring the different water layers balance;

Stabilized temperatures should also reduce the mountain glaciers melting, thus avoiding massive valley floods from one hand, and the danger of drying off the main water sources for the life in the lowlands;

It should stop further deserts enhancement by green belts, green, humid zones that not allow to dust and sand to flow in the air, and to form destructive sandstorms; it prevents the drought and erosion by keeping the moisture into the soil and roots of the plants;

Some economists and other experts suggest that the mankind should concentrate spending money on social and health projects like fighting AIDS, malaria, etc.; and leaving the legacy of Global Warming to the future generations. The supporters of the idea assume that the effects of climate change wouldnt happen before let say 100 years, so instead of thinking of unforeseeable, we should spend money on the apparent problems, for instance making Third world richer. This sounds good, but first of all, the Climate is not a static system that will start to alter after 100 years, it is happening all the time (we dont feel the Earths spinning either, but this doesnt mean that the Earth is still, right?); and second we should help poorer of us by giving them a job, not just cash give poor man a net, not a fishMore

 

top

 

Why now?

 

There were already few attempts to tow icebergs into dry lands, but only for direct consumption, not considered for long term, strategic usage. In 1977 and 1980 conferences were held to investigate the possibility of moving Antarctic icebergs to places where water shortages are frequently acute, e.g., Australia, California and Saudi Arabia. This controversial project, however, has not yet materialized.

 

What happened since then, to force the reconsideration of the idea?

For these years we have increased population (1980 4.4 billion, 2008 over 6.7 billion, 2020 expected 7.5 billion), with the same or even smaller water supplies (counting the pollution) a problem that is about to harden even more (valid also for food, energy, row materials, etc.);

For these 30 years we have significant technological advancement, for instance GPS that ensures optimal transportation; much more efficient engines more economic and clean, and more powerful; there is remarkable progress in communications, shipping, infrastructure, agricultural science, gene engineering, etc.

Asia's greenhouse gas emissions will treble over the next 25 years, according to a report commissioned by the Asian Development Bank (ADB). Some country members of the Kyoto Protocol cannot fulfil their CO2 quotas. Despite the protocol and other restraining efforts, greenhouse gas emissions still grow, which probably will be followed by natures response, so perhaps we should spend more time, money and endeavours to prepare territories / reserves for eventual refugee wave.

Ocean level is raising, while the deserts are expanding;

Polar and mountain glaciers melt with increasing speed;

Nature extremes (drought, cold, sharp temperature amplitudes, hurricanes, floods, landslides, etc.) hit harder business / infrastructure and people;

While the energy problem deepens, there is growing interest to renewable energy sources, including more fields with bio fuel crops.

Food & water crisis in the poorest countries, poverty and diseases are not defeated by the current aid programs; Western European and US rich governments try to push away the illegal immigration waves by laws, walls, night vision cameras, and other barriers. However, fighting the syndrome is not like fighting the problem beneath.

   Kyoto protocol extends to 2012. EUs Common Agricultural Policy extends to 2013. After these deadlines there must be signed new international agreements more comprehensive, more harmonic, more efficient.

   Stern report was clear spending 1 per cent of gross domestic product each year on tackling climate change would save 5 to 20 per cent of GDP by the end of the century. Dont we do the same when we insure our life or home?

While the complex problems accumulate, there are no too many alternatives for adequate response. Conservation couldnt catch up with the growing consumption; so more freshwater could be delivered either through desalination, or by icebergs utilisation. It is only a question of time.

 

top

 

About pro and con

 

There is continuous argumentation between the supporters and opponents of the idea of manmade global warming, but even if we put aside the global warming, could someone propose instead of greening, a better way to stop desert enhancement; to fight erosion, drought and landslides; to give the poor habitants in these areas an opportunity for managing their own lives, but not depending on aids and credits.

When a disaster happens, we cannot simply accept the loss (as we did it so far) This is a gods decision, Thats the mother natures will; but we must take some precautionary steps not only saving people by evacuating them preventively, but to harness this enormous energy, to make it work for us, not against us. We are talking already about terraforming, meaning adapting planets to our biological necessities, in order to further settlement; so even if today these words sound heretically, tomorrow this will be real.

First steps are done already as a result of the unprecedented tsunami disaster in South East Asia that killed almost a quarter of million people from many nationalities, the world got united and took unprecedented measures for relief and restoration, as well as unprecedented initiative for Global warning system. We must ask ourselves: should we take painful lessons every time, or we can learn from the past? More

 

top